Browsed by
Author: Peter Vodola

Court That Ruled CFPB Unconstitutional Also Concludes That Judge In NFL Concussion Litigation Was Correct To Invalidate Lawsuit Funding Deals

Court That Ruled CFPB Unconstitutional Also Concludes That Judge In NFL Concussion Litigation Was Correct To Invalidate Lawsuit Funding Deals

A federal court has concluded that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional.  In the ruling, described here and here,  the court dismissed the CFPB as a party but allowed the New York Attorney General to proceed with claims against a litigation funding company, RD Legal Funding (RD), for violations of federal and state law. One important issue that the court reached was whether the judge overseeing the NFL concussion litigation was correct in is view of…

Read More Read More

Court Describes Circuitous Route of NFL Concussion Litigation, Other Claims, to Recent CFPB Ruling

Court Describes Circuitous Route of NFL Concussion Litigation, Other Claims, to Recent CFPB Ruling

As described here, a federal court this month ruled that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. The court nonetheless denied the motion to dismiss by litigation funding company RD Legal Funding, because it ruled that the New York Attorney General had authority to challenge the transactions between RD and personal injury victims, including ex-National Football League players. U.S. District Court judge Loretta Preska also described the circuitous route by which she was asked to address the…

Read More Read More

In Litigation Over Litigation Funding Matters, Court Rules that CFPB’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

In Litigation Over Litigation Funding Matters, Court Rules that CFPB’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

The structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, and therefore claims of federal law violations against a litigation funding company fail. So ruled a U.S. District Court judge in a lawsuit brought by the CFPB and the New York Attorney General against a litigation funding company over, for one, the litigation funding company’s dealings with former National Football League players and, for another, the company’s transactions with individuals who suffered injuries as a result of the September 11,…

Read More Read More

U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Litigation Financing Means More Lawsuits, Prolonged Proceedings, Fewer Settlements

U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Litigation Financing Means More Lawsuits, Prolonged Proceedings, Fewer Settlements

The President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has penned an opinion piece stating that litigation financing “leads to more lawsuits, undercuts plaintiffs’ control of a case, and unnecessarily prolongs litigation.” Lisa Rickard’s op-ed article quoted recent news reports about how litigation funders have said they “make it harder and more expensive to settle cases.” She praised the recently-enacted Wisconsin legislators who passed “the first state law requiring transparency for all third-party funding arrangements” and said that Congress should recognize…

Read More Read More

New York Legislation Would Regulate Litigation Funding Deals

New York Legislation Would Regulate Litigation Funding Deals

New York’s legislature is considering legislation that would regulate consumer litigation funding transactions. The New York Law Journal reported this week that “[t]hird-party litigation financing is getting closer scrutiny in New York, where lawmakers are pushing to regulate an industry in which companies have been accused of charging unreasonably high fees and interest rates.” The May 29 article, NY Lawmakers Considering Bills to Regulate Consumer Litigation Funding, is available here.  

In Seeking To Recover Money Paid To Claimant, Litigation Funding Company Prevails On Some Legal Grounds

In Seeking To Recover Money Paid To Claimant, Litigation Funding Company Prevails On Some Legal Grounds

It is a legal maxim that when a contract is illegal, courts will leave the parties where they find them.  The result is that, if a party to a contract tries to recover on the contract, it will not get any aid from the courts.  But what if the claim is not enforcement of the illegal contract, but a request for recovery of monies paid pursuant to the unenforceable contract – on an equitable theory of unjust enrichment?  There, the…

Read More Read More

No Proof That Factoring Company Notified California Attorney General, Payee, Others, Says Court In Rejecting Proposed Transfer

No Proof That Factoring Company Notified California Attorney General, Payee, Others, Says Court In Rejecting Proposed Transfer

The payee changed his mind about selling his settlement payment rights, and the factoring company provided the court with no proof of service on interesting parties and included a prohibited provision in its proposed contract, so a California court recently issued a ruling rejecting a proposed transfer of structured settlement payment rights. Orange County, California, Superior Court Judge Robert J. Moss issued a May 18, 2018 tentative order denying the petition for court approval, under the California Structured Settlement Protection…

Read More Read More

News Reports Highlight Developments in Woodbridge Bankruptcy, SEC Proceedings

News Reports Highlight Developments in Woodbridge Bankruptcy, SEC Proceedings

The Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, filed for bankruptcy in December, shortly before the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit alleging the company ran a billion-dollar Ponzi scheme. Other lawsuits followed, and this month, there have been news reports about developments in the bankruptcy proceeding, the SEC lawsuit, and other actions involving the company – a company that perhaps was perhaps best known for real estate investments but whose businesses also included structured settlement factoring companies Woodbridge Structured Funding, Ash…

Read More Read More

‘Borrowing in the Shadow of Death’ Takes a Look at Another Type of ‘Fringe Lending’ – Probate Lending

‘Borrowing in the Shadow of Death’ Takes a Look at Another Type of ‘Fringe Lending’ – Probate Lending

Here at Secondary Insurance Market Blog, we have examined legal issues involving secondary markets for insurance products from the point of view of insurers and other non-lending parties whose interests may be adversely affected by such transactions. The types of such transactions include life settlements, litigation funding, pension factoring, and secondary markets for annuities, lottery payments, and for structured settlement payment rights. Occasionally, we delve into analogous transactions – such as those for entertainment tickets, or the payday loan business…

Read More Read More

Judge Overseeing Consolidated Opioid Litigation Wants Litigation Funding Information

Judge Overseeing Consolidated Opioid Litigation Wants Litigation Funding Information

The judge overseeing the multi-district litigation claims involving the opioid epidemic has ordered plaintiffs’ attorneys to disclose whether they have entered into any litigation funding agreements. U.S. District Court Judge Dan Polster, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, is overseeing several hundred consolidated lawsuits where many government entities – including states and cities – have sought recovery from drugmakers and distributors for the costs of dealing with opioid addiction.  Plaintiffs have claimed that the pharmaceutical…

Read More Read More